The Success of Sanctions Refutes a Key Argument in Favor of the Nuclear Deal with Iran
Willingly or unwillingly, European corporations have complied.
May 30, 2019
A new line of pro-choice argumentation makes little sense.
In a recent article in Newsweek, a writer suggested that there may be people whose religion requires them to perform abortions, and therefore laws restricting the practice violate the Bill of Rights’ guarantee of the free exercise of religion. In a similar vein, the New York Times’s Linda Greenhouse contended that the First Amendment prohibition on the establishment of a federal religion preempts religiously inspired restrictions on abortion. Mitchell Rocklin and Howard Slugh dismantle this newly popular line of argumentation:
Get the best Jewish ideas and conversations. Subscribe to Tikvah Ideas All Access for $12/month
Login or SubscribeWillingly or unwillingly, European corporations have complied.
Rabbi Judah Solomon Alkalai, the Herzl of Sarajevo.
His stubbornness will likely lead to new elections.
A new line of pro-choice argumentation makes little sense.
“By the way, the beer isn’t bad.”