Tikvah
Subscribe
Gur Nation State Main
Israeli Druze men protest against the new nation-state law on August 4, 2018 in Tel Aviv. Amir Levy/Getty Images.
Response to October's Essay

October 8, 2018

What the Druze Know about Israel that Israeli Jews Have Forgotten

By Haviv Rettig Gur

They've leveled a criticism at Israel's new nation-state law that neither the right’s earnest patriotism nor the left’s moral anxiety seems equipped to answer.

There is much that is true and important in Moshe Koppel and Eugene Kontorovich’s defense in Mosaic of Israel’s new Basic Law: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People. The law, passed by the Knesset on July 19, articulates concepts of identity and nationhood that are fundamental and agreed-upon among nearly all Israeli Jews.

Vociferous critics of the law, with their cries about the “death of Israeli democracy,” have struggled to make a substantive case for what the law will change in practice. But in the end it changes little. In a country without a formal constitution, it is a law, like other Basic Laws, of the sort that does not so much affect the day-to-day business of individuals or even the state as it is meant to sway the decisions of Israel’s judges, and especially the justices of the Supreme Court.

Even in that realm, its effect might be minimal. Expressing their hope that “some judges will . . . have the integrity to take the law seriously,” the authors frankly acknowledge that others, “unsympathetic to manifestations of nationalism[,] will have little difficulty finding the interpretive tools to construe the new Basic Law in a way that allows them to reach precisely the same conclusions they would reach in its absence.” That is, the law only provides a constitutional anchor for those judges who are already predisposed to rule in favor of “manifestations of nationalism” or are otherwise open to persuasion.

Subscribe to Continue Reading

Get the best Jewish ideas and conversations. Subscribe to Tikvah Ideas All Access for $12/month

Login or Subscribe
Save

Responses to October 's Essay