
January 7, 2019
Middle East Strategy? What Middle East Strategy?
By Elliott AbramsTo Michael Doran, the administration’s many statements and actions concerning the Middle East reflect a "coherent vision." If true—which is doubtful—it's the wrong vision.
In his new essay in Mosaic, Michael Doran, whose writings about the Middle East are invaluable, has tried to explain . . . everything. That is: to document the damage done by President Barack Obama in destroying traditional U.S. alliances in the Middle East; to demonstrate why cozying up to enemies and treating allies with contempt is dangerous; to alert us that the Obama “echo chamber” is still hard at work advancing the former president’s agenda; to analyze how a rupture in relations with the Saudis would be a foolish move; and to register the peril contained in the moral preenings of too many American journalists and politicians.
And then Doran sets himself the really difficult task: to make sense of, and to defend, the policies in the region now being implemented by the Trump administration.
I know how hard this is to do because I’ve tried it myself. Last November, I wrote in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz that the president “has reasserted that the U.S. knows who its friends are and who they are not, a simple, old-fashioned, yet absolutely indispensable stance for a world power.” In his recounting of the many ways in which President Obama’s deviations from that stance harmed our national-security interests, Doran shows in detail exactly why the distinction between friends and adversaries is so critical for us and our allies.
Responses to January ’s Essay
January 2019
Middle East Strategy? What Middle East Strategy?
By Elliott AbramsJanuary 2019
Is the American Withdrawal from Syria a Disaster, or an Opportunity, or Something Else?
By Martin KramerJanuary 2019
Why Turkey Is No Partner for the United States
By Steven A. CookJanuary 2019
Getting Smart about America’s Middle East Policy
By Michael Doran