Tikvah
Subscribe
netanyahu us and israeli flags
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images.
Response to April's Essay

April 1, 2019

An American Perspective on Israel’s Election

By Douglas J. Feith

Washington could encourage a strategic realignment in the Middle East and a helpful reframing of the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

Much of the foreign commentary after Israel’s April 9 election has dealt with its supposed effect on Israel-Palestinian relations. Because the results were good for incumbent Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, critics say they are bad for “peace diplomacy.” As one Washington Post columnist complained, “Israel’s election has made the path to a two-state solution even rockier.”

To the average Israeli, these complaints are beyond stale, bringing to mind debates that raged mostly in the 1980s and 90s but today are nearly non-existent. What the election effectively confirms is that Israelis, by a huge majority, blame the lack of peace on the Palestinian Authority (PA), not on Netanyahu’s government. Although most remain willing to recognize Palestinian statehood, they’ve lost hope that this would satisfy their enemies or end the conflict.

As Haviv Rettig Gur puts it in his incisive Mosaic essay:

Subscribe to Continue Reading

Get the best Jewish ideas and conversations. Subscribe to Tikvah Ideas All Access for $12/month

Login or Subscribe
Save

Responses to April 's Essay