
March 4, 2019
How to Argue about the Immigration Mess
By Nicholas M. GallagherWho gets to join the people, and how, is a question as old as Athens. It's sophomoric to pretend the issue doesn't exist for us.
I’m grateful to Christopher Caldwell, Linda Chavez, and Daniel Johnson for their thoughtful, and thought-provoking, responses to my essay in Mosaic on America’s immigration woes. Especially heartening is their evidently broad agreement with me that the distinction between migrants and refugees is analytically outmoded and in need of rethinking as a tool of law. I also greatly appreciate the focus on history and the international perspective that the respondents bring to bear.
In what follows I mean to comment on three themes that, in various ways, are addressed by each respondent—and then to point to a motif that, without ever being made explicit, seems to me to lurk behind our joint discussion.
The Jewish Angle
Subscribe to Continue Reading
Get the best Jewish ideas and conversations. Subscribe to Tikvah Ideas All Access for $12/month
Login or SubscribeResponses to March 's Essay
March 2019
The Migratory History of the Jews Has Little to Teach about Today’s Immigration Woes
By Christopher CaldwellMarch 2019
Don’t Worry About Immigrants’ Ability to Succeed
By Linda ChavezMarch 2019
Refugees, Migrants, Foreigners, and More
By Daniel JohnsonMarch 2019
How to Argue about the Immigration Mess
By Nicholas M. Gallagher